Environmental campaigner George Monbiot has said those who care about protecting the river Wye "occupy two different planets" if they continue eating chicken.
He was responding to a debate on whether installing incinerators to burn waste from poultry farms in the river's catchment area could prevent pollution arising from them entering the river.
Chicken manure spread on surrounding fields is believed to contribute to the high levels of phosphate in particular entering the river, leading to periodic algal blooms which harm fish and other wildlife.
In October one of the largest poultry farm operators in the area, Avara Foods, said it would work to remove phosphate from poultry manure by employing chemical stripping and pyrolysis, a form of incineration.
The Wye Catchment Conservators, which represents fishery owners of the river Wye and its tributaries, appeared to welcome this.
It Tweeted: "The UK still needs chicken, so the IPU’s [intensive poultry units] have to go somewhere, and who would compensate the owners of those removed? So a practical and deliverable solution is needed, and fast."
In an ideal world you would. But the U.K. still needs chicken, so the IPU’s have to go somewhere, and who would compensate the owners of those removed. So a practical and deliverable solution is needed, and fast.
— Wye Catchment Conservators (@CatchmentWye) December 13, 2021
But Monbiot replied: "I think it would be better to say 'people in the UK choose to eat chicken'. We do not NEED chicken.
I think it would be better to say "people in the UK choose to eat chicken". We do not NEED chicken. It's time conservationists became bolder and spoke out against the world's greatest cause of ecological destruction: animal farming.
— George Monbiot (@GeorgeMonbiot) December 13, 2021
"It's time conservationists became bolder and spoke out against the world's greatest cause of ecological destruction: animal farming."
He added: "River conservationists I meet rail against these disasters, but carry on eating meat like there's no tomorrow. It's as if they occupy two different planets at once."
True. But I'm constantly amazed by anglers and other river conservationists I meet, who rail against these disasters, but carry on eating meat like there's no tomorrow. It's as if they occupy two different planets at once.
— George Monbiot (@GeorgeMonbiot) December 13, 2021
RELATED NEWS:
- New strategy needed to save 'priceless' Wye, says MP
- Big solar farm planned near Herefordshire villages
Campaigning Twitter user 3 Wyes Women was sceptical of Avara's proposed solution, saying: "Can someone please explain the cumulative environmental impact of numerous industrial incinerators run by chicken farmers in the Wye catchment?"
Avara Foods investing in phosphate stripping technology and pyrolysis plants. Can someone please explain, to the planning officers, the cummulative environmental impact of numerous industrial incinerators run by chicken farmers in the Wye catchment? https://t.co/j5PNDtSBzN
— 3 Wyes Women (@EMorfett) December 11, 2021
They claimed chicken litter incineration had already been rejected in the US on air pollution grounds.
Avara Foods said it has reduced the level of phosphates in its feed, and therefore in the litter, by 8 per cent over the last two years.
It is also working to divert all litter to other outlets, such as recycling plants that convert animal waste to heat, light and fuel while removing phosphates.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel