DR Michael Gray, headmaster of Hereford Cathedral School, justifies the existence of independent schools such as his by saying that they save public money that would otherwise be needed for the education of independent school pupils (Letters, September 12).

He also cites the fact that such schools bring in revenue from foreign students. Surely, we should be discussing the social and educational consequences of having a divisive education system and not reduce it to a matter of economics?

ALSO READ:

Other countries, and especially Scandinavian countries, have minimal independent education, and this education may actually be funded by the state and be required to follow the same national curriculum. These countries score above the UK on measures of happiness and wellbeing at least in part because there is greater equality where education is concerned.

Dr Gray then mentions bursaries that widen access to independent education. This implies that independent education is superior education.

More young people are thus enabled to enjoy elitist education. Around seven per cent of UK school pupils are privately educated but these are far more likely to enter professions such as medicine and law and senior positions in, for example, the civil service.

What are your thoughts?

You can send a letter to the editor to have your say by clicking here.

Letters should not exceed 250 words and local issues take precedence.

I roughly calculate that the annual fees of a senior pupil at Dr Gray’s school would be around £18,000 (with approximately £34,000 in addition for boarding fees). The median UK household disposable income is around £33,000.

I note from the school’s website that it follows Christian values. Giving people a better chance in life because they have more money does not seem Christian to me.

JOE COCKER

Leominster