A plan to build five houses in a south Herefordshire hamlet has been passed by a government-appointed inspector despite locals’ many concerns.
Richard Williams applied in July 2022 for permission to build the three- and four-bedroom houses alongside the main road through Glewstone, southwest of Ross-on-Wye.
Several residents objected to the plan, including at a meeting of Marstow parish council where concerns over traffic and road safety, water supply, drainage, loss of “first-class” farmland and lack of local amenities were raised.
RELATED NEWS:
- Five 'suburban' homes won't now be built in Glewstone, Herefordshire
- Outcome of plan to convert packhouse on Herefordshire farm to home
- How much former chapel will cost Herefordshire village
Herefordshire Council’s planning officer Gemma Webster ruled that the spot would be “unsustainable, given that there will be an virtually complete reliance on the private car to access daily services”.
The visual impact of the “elevated” houses on the Wye Valley area of outstanding natural beauty (AONB), coupled with the loss of a hedgerow, was also given as a reason for refusing the scheme.
Mr Williams then appealed against the refusal to the government’s Planning Inspectorate, whose appointed inspector B Philips has now found in his favour.
OTHER NEWS:
- A million tonnes of sand and gravel can be quarried in Herefordshire
- Could thousands more homes be the price of Hereford bypass plan?
- Decision on farmer-less 'farmhouse' near Pontrilas, Herefordshire
The inspector judged the scheme to be “proportionate”, and noted that the council’s own local plan “identifies Glewstone as a ‘locally sustainable settlement’ where housing is appropriate”.
“The Government’s broader objective is to significantly boost the supply of homes,” they pointed out.
Visually, the houses would occupy a gap between the hamlet’s two hubs, and from a distance “would appear as a logical extension of the linear highway-fronting built form”.
The claim that the village has low water pressure “is not substantiated”, there would be “limited” increase in traffic and pedestrians, while the loss of farmland would be “minor”, the inspector added.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel